Are less likely to report that their organization is slowing its adoption of AI technologies because of emerging risks-as the figure illustrates, 58% of the Dabbler group reports this, versus only 41% of the Leader group.Report lower levels of concern about a range of potential risks of AI, such as AI failures affecting business, backlash from customers, negative employee reactions, potential job losses, lack of transparency, and ethical issues.A strong focus on actively managing AI risks appears to pay off in several ways. ![]() The Leaders believe AI has greater strategic importance to their business: 40% see AI as “critically important” to their business today, versus only 18% of the Dabblers-and within two years, those numbers are expected to rise to 63% and 36%, respectively. To investigate whether actively managing AI risks has any tangible benefit, we compared two groups of AI adopters that approach those risks differently: Risk Management Leaders (11%) undertake more than three AI risk management practices and align their AI risk management with their organization’s broader risk management efforts, while Risk Management Dabblers (51%) undertake up to three AI risk management practices but are not aligning them with broader risk management efforts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |